From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262583AbVGHLsr (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:48:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262459AbVGHLsq (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:48:46 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:1203 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262583AbVGHLsl (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:48:41 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:48:38 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Alistair John Strachan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Realtime Preemption, 2.6.12, Beginners Guide? Message-ID: <20050708114838.GA12272@elte.hu> References: <200507061257.36738.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <200507071237.42470.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> <20050707114223.GA29825@elte.hu> <200507081047.07643.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200507081047.07643.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Alistair John Strachan wrote: > Well, just to let others who have this problem know, it's clear that > Ingo's rt-preempt patches increase stack pressure on systems (like > mine) where stack is borderline under 4K by default. btw., which gcc version are you using? Ingo