From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262588AbVGMFjv (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:39:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262593AbVGMFju (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:39:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:12766 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262588AbVGMFjt (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 01:39:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:39:47 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Joe Sevy Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: usb mass storage bug Message-Id: <20050712223947.796a4939.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 13:30:47 -0700 (PDT), Joe Sevy wrote: > Sorry, no logs or dmesg to report; just performance. > Using kernel 2.6.12: USB flash drive (san-disk cruzer > micro) Copy FROM drive is normal and quick; copy TO > drive is amazingly slow. (30 minutes for 50K file). > Used same configuration as for 2.6.11.11. Cured by > going back to old kernel. Symptoms seem similar to this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159269 Try 2.6.13-rc2, it would be a valuable data point. -- Pete