From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262313AbVGMVfv (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:35:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262566AbVGMVeJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:34:09 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:22150 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262351AbVGMVbN (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:31:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 14:31:07 -0700 From: Pete Zaitcev To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zaitcev@redhat.com Subject: Re: usb mass storage bug Message-Id: <20050713143107.5af22149.zaitcev@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20050713205316.GA16238@kroah.com> References: <20050711203047.39437.qmail@web33113.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20050712225013.2e66d0fc.zaitcev@redhat.com> <20050713205316.GA16238@kroah.com> Organization: Red Hat, Inc. X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.0.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.6.7; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:53:16 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > You are right, ub isn't _that_ slow at all, I use it all the time on > some of my devices just fine. Ub actually gets terribly slow when partition size is odd (for both reading and writing). I even have a patch for it, but it's yucky. Here's the original discussion: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_frm/thread/f11b7721d7ed6d1f&hl=en -- Pete