From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261738AbVGPRMu (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:12:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261752AbVGPRMg (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:12:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:16003 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261741AbVGPRMJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:12:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 19:11:26 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Daniel Walker Cc: Karsten Wiese , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-final-V0.7.50-24 Message-ID: <20050716171126.GA16235@elte.hu> References: <200507121223.10704.annabellesgarden@yahoo.de> <20050712140251.GB18296@elte.hu> <1121178339.10199.8.camel@c-67-188-6-232.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20050712142828.GA20798@elte.hu> <1121178696.10199.11.camel@c-67-188-6-232.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20050712144645.GA21517@elte.hu> <1121180216.10199.13.camel@c-67-188-6-232.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <1121479880.21287.4.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1121479880.21287.4.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Daniel Walker wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 07:56 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 16:46 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > > > > I haven't tested it recently . This was on an older version of RT > > > > though . I could try it if it's interesting ? Or do you think it's > > > > already fixed? > > > > > > it would be definitely interesting to see how robust the latest IO-APIC > > > code is. > > > > I'm sure you test that all the time, but I'll try it .. > > I tried it, and it appears to be fixed in current RT .. cool, thanks. Ingo