From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932400AbVISJYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 05:24:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932401AbVISJYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 05:24:45 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:58598 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932400AbVISJYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2005 05:24:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:24:44 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , ReiserFS List , LKML Subject: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel Message-ID: <20050919092444.GA17501@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "Vladimir V. Saveliev" , ReiserFS List , LKML References: <432AFB44.9060707@namesys.com> <20050918110658.GA22744@infradead.org> <432E8282.6060905@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <432E8282.6060905@namesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 01:18:58PM +0400, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > Hello > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > I threw in your new codedrop into a compilation and the byte-order > > mess is _still_ now sorted out. > > Did compiling notice this mess? > We used to compile with C=1. Should we compile somehow else before sending code out? Log is at: http://verein.lst.de/~hch/reiser4.log C=1 with whatever sparse version I had, nevermind what version it is code is not good, just use __le types instead of structs and casting exercises, makes the code simpler and easier to verify.