From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965052AbVITSZg (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:25:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965032AbVITSZg (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:25:36 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:44404 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965057AbVITSZf (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:25:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:25:24 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Hans Reiser Cc: Horst von Brand , Nick Piggin , Alan Cox , thenewme91@gmail.com, Christoph Hellwig , Denis Vlasenko , chriswhite@gentoo.org, LKML , ReiserFS List , Nate Diller Subject: Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel Message-ID: <20050920182523.GS10845@suse.de> References: <200509201542.j8KFgh2q011730@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> <43304AF2.8080404@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43304AF2.8080404@namesys.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 20 2005, Hans Reiser wrote: > Horst von Brand wrote: > > > > > > >Funny that the "texbook algorithms" aren't used in real life. Wonder why... > > > > > Try BSD. If the BSD book can be believed, they use"texbook algorithms". Even the BSD people are looking for better algorithms. To be honest, I think any OS using the classic elevator sort is a joke. It's only really suited for batch processing. -- Jens Axboe