From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750901AbVIUN2D (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:28:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750914AbVIUN2D (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:28:03 -0400 Received: from 167.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.167]:33678 "HELO port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750901AbVIUN2B (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:28:01 -0400 From: Denis Vlasenko To: Robert.Boermans@uk.telex.com Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:27:12 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509211627.12154.vda@ilport.com.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 21 September 2005 16:20, Robert.Boermans@uk.telex.com wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that the bogomips results for the two cores on my machine are > consistently not the same, the second one is always reported slightly > faster, it's a small difference and I saw the same in a posted dmesg from > somebody else on the list. Which made me wonder: I guess it's a cache warming effect. Please show the numbers. -- vda