From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: saw@saw.sw.com.sg, jgarzik@pobox.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 09:01:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051118090158.GA11621@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051118033302.GO11494@stusta.de>
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 04:33:02AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch removes the obsolete drivers/net/eepro100.c driver.
>
> Is there any reason why it should be kept?
Tt's the only driver which works correctly on ARM CPUs. e100 is
basically buggy. This has been discussed here on lkml and more
recently on linux-netdev. If anyone has any further questions
please read the archives of those two lists.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-18 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-18 3:33 [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c Adrian Bunk
2005-11-18 9:01 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-11-18 9:08 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 16:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-11-18 16:32 ` Russell King
2005-11-19 20:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-11-23 22:15 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 22:24 ` Russell King
2005-11-24 10:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2005-11-23 22:39 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-23 22:53 ` Russell King
2005-11-23 23:01 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 17:04 ` Tim Schmielau
2006-01-05 18:18 Adrian Bunk
2006-01-05 18:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-05 21:04 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2006-01-15 0:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-15 13:19 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-01-17 18:48 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-01-17 22:27 ` John Ronciak
2006-01-18 0:32 ` John W. Linville
2006-01-18 0:36 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-01-18 10:34 ` Vitaly Bordug
2006-01-16 0:08 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051118090158.GA11621@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saw@saw.sw.com.sg \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).