From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751151AbVK1FeG (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:34:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751235AbVK1FeG (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:34:06 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:8882 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751151AbVK1FeF (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:34:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 06:33:59 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo , Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel , Andrew Morton , "Raj, Ashok" , Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386/x86_64: Don't IPI to offline cpus on shutdown Message-ID: <20051128053359.GM20775@brahms.suse.de> References: <20051127135833.GH20775@brahms.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > It looks like the obviously correct fix is to only call > machine_shutdown when pm_power_off is defined. Doing > that will make Andi's assumption about not scheduling > true and generally simplify what must be supported. Looks like a reasonable fix. Thanks. -Andi