On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 12:12:09AM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote:

> -> netif_poll_disable() may sleep while a spinlock is held.

So it can, thanks.

> Btw, the poll/close routines seem racy with each other.

I had been under the impression that the stack was supposed to make sure
that no poll() is running before the driver close() gets called?  I
could well be missing something there, though.  Indeed, now that I think
about it the calls netif_poll_disable() in suspend() ought to mean that
we don't need to look at hands_off inside poll().

-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."