From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750902AbVLILp2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:45:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751267AbVLILp2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:45:28 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:64292 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750884AbVLILp1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2005 06:45:27 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 12:46:42 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Erik Slagter Cc: Jeff Garzik , Randy Dunlap , hch@infradead.org, mjg59@srcf.ucam.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: RFC: ACPI/scsi/libata integration and hotswap Message-ID: <20051209114641.GH26185@suse.de> References: <20051208133945.GA21633@srcf.ucam.org> <20051208134438.GA13507@infradead.org> <1134062330.1732.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43989B00.5040503@pobox.com> <20051208133144.0f39cb37.randy_d_dunlap@linux.intel.com> <1134121522.27633.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051209103937.GE26185@suse.de> <1134125145.27633.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <43996A26.8060700@pobox.com> <1134128127.27633.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1134128127.27633.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 09 2005, Erik Slagter wrote: > I case this (still) isn't clear, I am addressing the attitude of "It's > ACPI so it's not going to be used, period". The problem seems to be that you are misunderstanding the 'attitude', which was mainly based on the initial patch sent out which stuffs acpi directly in everywhere. That seems to be a good trigger for curt/direct replies. -- Jens Axboe