From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161091AbVLKFfq (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:35:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161092AbVLKFfq (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:35:46 -0500 Received: from dsl092-053-140.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.53.140]:63454 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161091AbVLKFfp (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Dec 2005 00:35:45 -0500 From: Rob Landley Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 23:33:02 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Mark Lord , Adrian Bunk , David Ranson , Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Andree References: <20051203135608.GJ31395@stusta.de> <200512071214.26574.rob@landley.net> <439ADAF3.9040705@tmr.com> In-Reply-To: <439ADAF3.9040705@tmr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200512102333.02855.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 10 December 2005 07:41, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Given that CL has minimal (essentially no) maintenence cost, then by your own admission maintaining it as an external patch for people who need it for legacy reasons is trivial, and removing it to discourage new users from picking it up remains a good idea. Rob -- Steve Ballmer: Innovation! Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.