From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965106AbVLNXnU (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:43:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965107AbVLNXnU (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:43:20 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:31127 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965106AbVLNXnS (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:43:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:42:55 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Pete Zaitcev Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, katzj@redhat.com Subject: Re: "block" symlink in sysfs for a multifunction device Message-ID: <20051214234255.GA3275@kroah.com> References: <20051212134904.225dcc5d.zaitcev@redhat.com> <20051214055019.GA23036@kroah.com> <20051214152615.13b6b105.zaitcev@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051214152615.13b6b105.zaitcev@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:26:15PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 21:50:19 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > $ ls -l /sys/block/uba/device/ > > -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4096 Dec 13 21:31 bNumEndpoints > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 13 21:31 block:uba -> ../../../../../../block/uba > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 13 21:31 block:ubb -> ../../../../../../block/ubb > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 13 21:31 block:ubc -> ../../../../../../block/ubc > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 13 21:31 block:ubd -> ../../../../../../block/ubd > > Greg, Jeremy is not happy about this. > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175563 > > ------- Additional Comments From katzj@redhat.com 2005-12-14 18:05 EST ------- > > Actually, this is problematic. It makes it so that the single device directory > > corresponds to more than one device which we can't handle with kudzu :-( Well, how do you handle it for class devices then? And if this isn't acceptable, what would be? Just because kudzu is messed up... :) thanks, greg k-h