From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932353AbVLPQif (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:38:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932357AbVLPQie (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:38:34 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:64671 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932353AbVLPQie (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Dec 2005 11:38:34 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:38:25 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: akpm@osdl.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dasd: remove dynamic ioctl registration Message-ID: <20051216163825.GA21977@lst.de> References: <20051216143348.GB19541@lst.de> <1134745099.5495.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051216150058.GA20144@lst.de> <1134750741.5495.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1134750741.5495.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -4.901 () BAYES_00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Ok understood, but at least I have warn the EMC people about that change > so that they can send a patch for the dasd driver .. Sure, at this patch is a 2.6.16 thing, which is more than enough time for them. I'm happy to review any code they submit for kernel inclusion.