From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932191AbWAEVE7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:04:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932192AbWAEVE6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:04:58 -0500 Received: from alephnull.demon.nl ([83.160.184.112]:62648 "EHLO xi.wantstofly.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932191AbWAEVE5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:04:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 22:04:44 +0100 From: Lennert Buytenhek To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Adrian Bunk , saw@saw.sw.com.sg, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove drivers/net/eepro100.c Message-ID: <20060105210444.GA5878@xi.wantstofly.org> References: <20060105181826.GD12313@stusta.de> <43BD6C03.2080605@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43BD6C03.2080605@pobox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 01:57:07PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >This patch removes the obsolete drivers/net/eepro100.c driver. > > > >Is there any known problem in e100 still preventing us from removing > >this driver (it seems noone was able anymore to verify the ARM problem)? > > Still waiting to see if e100 in -mm works on ARM. e100 seems to work okay on the (modern) ARM CPUs I've tried. The case where e100 failed but eepro100 worked was (I think) on older ARM hardware, and I'm not sure whether that kind of hardware is used anymore.. cheers, Lennert