From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: dada1@cosmosbay.com
Cc: ak@suse.de, paulmck@us.ibm.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, manfred@colorfullife.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 23:44:40 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060106.234440.53993868.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43BF6F0B.4060108@cosmosbay.com>
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 08:34:35 +0100
> I agree, I do use a hashed spinlock array on my local tree for TCP,
> mainly to reduce the hash table size by a 2 factor.
So what do you think about going to a single spinlock for the
routing cache?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-07 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060105235845.967478000@sorel.sous-sol.org>
2006-01-05 21:47 ` [PATCH 0/6] -stable review Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:45 ` [PATCH 1/6] drivers/net/sungem.c: gem_remove_one mustnt be __devexit Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] ieee80211_crypt_tkip depends on NET_RADIO Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] Insanity avoidance in /proc (CVE-2005-4605) Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] sysctl: dont overflow the user-supplied buffer with 0 Chris Wright
2006-01-06 1:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-01-06 3:40 ` Chris Wright
2006-01-06 10:17 ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 12:52 ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency (Version 2), HOTPLUG_CPU fix Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 12:58 ` [PATCH, RFC] RCU : OOM avoidance and lower latency Andi Kleen
2006-01-06 13:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 19:26 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06 22:18 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-06 13:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 14:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 14:45 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-06 16:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-06 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 20:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-06 20:33 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-06 20:57 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-07 0:17 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 1:09 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-07 7:10 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 7:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-07 7:44 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2006-01-07 7:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-07 8:36 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-07 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2006-01-07 8:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2006-01-06 19:24 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-06 0:46 ` [PATCH 5/6] UFS: inode->i_sem is not released in error path Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:46 ` [PATCH 6/6] [ATYFB]: Fix onboard video on SPARC Blade 100 for 2.6.{13,14,15} Chris Wright
2006-01-06 0:53 ` [PATCH 0/6] -stable review Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060106.234440.53993868.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).