From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932643AbWAKGpO (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:45:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932651AbWAKGpO (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:45:14 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:46790 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932643AbWAKGpM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:45:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:44:51 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Coywolf Qi Hunt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: why no -mm git tree? Message-Id: <20060110224451.44c9d3da.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060111055616.GA5976@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060111055616.GA5976@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote: > > Why don't use a -mm git tree? > Because everthing would take me 100x longer? I'm looking into generating a pullable git tree for each -mm. Just as a convenience for people who can't type "ftp". That'll just be a dump of the whole -mm lineup into git. I don't know how workable it'll be - we'll see.