From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932358AbWAKIgO (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:36:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932494AbWAKIgO (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:36:14 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:28363 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932358AbWAKIgM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:36:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:36:08 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20060111.003608.126208924.davem@davemloft.net> To: arjan@infradead.org Cc: drepper@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1136967192.2929.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> References: <43C42F0C.10008@redhat.com> <20060111.000020.25886635.davem@davemloft.net> <1136967192.2929.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arjan van de Ven Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:13:11 +0100 > > The first suggestion isn't considered ugly, and the best form is: > > > > if (ih->frag_off & __constant_htons(IP_OFFSET)) > > why this __constant_htons and not just plain htons ?? > htons() gets auto-remapped to that anyway via the builtin "is this a > constant" thing...... and to be honest htons() is more readable. You're right. We use the __constant_*() things for structure initialization which needs to be compile time.