From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932626AbWAKIoR (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:44:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932630AbWAKIoQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:44:16 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:25259 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932626AbWAKIoP (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:44:15 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:44:18 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20060111.004418.92939254.davem@davemloft.net> To: drepper@redhat.com Cc: arjan@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ntohs/ntohl and bitops From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <43C4C37B.9020801@redhat.com> References: <20060111.000020.25886635.davem@davemloft.net> <1136967192.2929.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <43C4C37B.9020801@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.53 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ulrich Drepper Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:36:11 -0800 > Anyway, candidates for this kind of transformation: > > net/ipx/af_ipx.c:1450: if (ntohs(addr->sipx_port) < > IPX_MIN_EPHEMERAL_SOCKET && Does it work for comparisons? F.e.: if (val < ntohs(VAL))