From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932604AbWAKSqE (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:46:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932539AbWAKSpx (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:45:53 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:18335 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932604AbWAKSpi (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:45:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:45:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Roman Zippel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.15-mm3 Message-Id: <20060111104520.42a766d1.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20060111042135.24faf878.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roman Zippel wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > -hrtimer-... > > Andrew, why did you merge this one? :-( > Because the egregious rename-the-whole-world parts got taken out and everyone who'd looked at and worked on the code except for yourself was happy with it. Ignoring the objections of a long-standing and respected kernel developer is not a thing I like to do, but fortunately it's very rare. Can you summarise, yet again, in as few words as possible, what you find wrong with it? I'd really like to understand, but there were waay too many lengthy emails..