From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030411AbWALOjD (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:39:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030421AbWALOjD (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:39:03 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:38343 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030411AbWALOjB (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:39:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:38:51 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , kernel list Subject: Re: Place for userland swsusp parts Message-ID: <20060112143851.GB9752@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060111221511.GA8223@elf.ucw.cz> <200601120819.42512.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200601120819.42512.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Čt 12-01-06 08:19:42, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Thursday 12 January 2006 08:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is there some place where we could put userland swsusp parts under > > version control? > > > > swsusp.sf.net looks like possible place, but it has been in use by > > suspend2... Is it still being used? If not, would it be possible to > > "hijack" it for swsusp development? > > It's not still being used (we have suspend2.net now). The only problem I see > with that is that it still has all the old suspend2 stuff and Sourceforge > make it really hard to clear out a project's files. You were talking about > calling it uswsusp or something like that. How about starting a > uswsusp.sf.net? Rafael, do you have repository to place userland parts in, or should I start uswsusp.sf.net project, or do you want to do it? Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp!