From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161599AbWAMAVx (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:21:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161597AbWAMAVx (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:21:53 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:29347 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161599AbWAMAVx (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:21:53 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:21:38 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Nigel Cunningham , kernel list Subject: Re: Place for userland swsusp parts Message-ID: <20060113002138.GE10088@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060111221511.GA8223@elf.ucw.cz> <200601120819.42512.ncunningham@linuxmail.org> <20060112143851.GB9752@elf.ucw.cz> <200601122113.24461.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601122113.24461.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > On Thursday 12 January 2006 08:15, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > Is there some place where we could put userland swsusp parts under > > > > version control? > > > > > > > > swsusp.sf.net looks like possible place, but it has been in use by > > > > suspend2... Is it still being used? If not, would it be possible to > > > > "hijack" it for swsusp development? > > > > > > It's not still being used (we have suspend2.net now). The only problem I see > > > with that is that it still has all the old suspend2 stuff and Sourceforge > > > make it really hard to clear out a project's files. You were talking about > > > calling it uswsusp or something like that. How about starting a > > > uswsusp.sf.net? > > > > Rafael, do you have repository to place userland parts in, or should I > > start uswsusp.sf.net project, or do you want to do it? > > I think I can host them (the box is moving tomorrow, hopefully, so it should get > enough bandwidth ;-)), but I'm afraid I won't have time to set up a mailing list > etc. Actually, it would probably be better to put it on sourceforge or something like that. That way you don't have to care about sysadmin stuff (mailing lists etc), backups, backup conectivity, etc, etc. > IMHO uswsusp.sf.net would be too similar to swsusp.sf.net, especially that > swsusp.sf.net is redirected to www.suspend2.net. Or maybe we can get hosting on suspend2.net? Or create userswsusp.sf.net (that name is ugly :-(). ...some revision control would be nice, but perhaps revision control is enough and we can just put git tree on kernel.org? Pavel -- Thanks, Sharp!