From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161171AbWAMKaG (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:30:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161549AbWAMKaG (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:30:06 -0500 Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.36]:61624 "EHLO smtp6-g19.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161171AbWAMKaC (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:30:02 -0500 From: Duncan Sands To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/13] USBATM: summary Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:30:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, usbatm@lists.infradead.org References: <200601121729.52596.baldrick@free.fr> <20060112183001.GA23777@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20060112183001.GA23777@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601131130.04762.baldrick@free.fr> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I only got 2 of these, is my mail just being slow (which it does at odd > times), or did you stop sending them based on some problems on your end? Hi Greg, I stopped because I noticed that part of patch 2 had slipped into patch 3 (the bit that slipped was exactly the tweak I made to patch 2 to have it compile by itself... probably ended up in patch 3 due to a forgotten "quilt refresh"), and I wanted to check all the other patches. They are fine, so I have now sent them. However, patch 2 won't compile unless you apply patch 3 as well. Since they are both trivial, I hope you are ok with that, otherwise I can rediff them All the best, Duncan.