From: thockin@hockin.org
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:16:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060113181631.GA15366@hockin.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1137175117.15108.18.camel@mindpipe>
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:58:36PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
> > If your BIOS has an ACPI "HPET" table, then the kernel can use the HPET
> > timer instead. It doesn't solve the problem for apps or other kernel bits
> > that use rdtsc directly, but there are other fixes for that floating
> > around which will hopefully get consideration when they're mature.
>
> The apps can be converted to use clock_gettime(), but that does not help
> if the kernel can't keep reasonable time on these machines.
Some apps/users need higher resolution and lower overhead that only rdtsc
can offer currently.
> But if we just use "clock=pmtmr" by default on these machines the TSC is
> not a problem right?
I never tried it with pmtimer, we had HPET available. Empirically TSC did
not work (and we had a simple test case to show how bad it could get).
HPET made that go away for users of gettimeofday().
We're exploring rdtsc-compatible solutions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-13 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-12 22:17 Dual core Athlons and unsynced TSCs Lee Revell
2006-01-13 15:10 ` Roger Heflin
2006-01-13 16:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 17:47 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 17:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 17:54 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 18:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 18:55 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 20:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 20:26 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 20:40 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 20:43 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 20:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-01-13 20:48 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 20:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-01-13 20:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 21:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-13 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-01-13 21:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-16 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2006-01-16 15:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-14 0:23 ` john stultz
2006-01-14 1:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-14 1:14 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-14 1:23 ` john stultz
2006-01-14 1:27 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-14 1:39 ` john stultz
2006-01-14 1:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-14 1:50 ` john stultz
2006-01-14 2:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-14 2:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-01-16 1:19 ` Andi Kleen
2006-01-14 6:54 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-01-13 18:06 ` thockin
2006-01-13 17:58 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 18:16 ` thockin [this message]
2006-01-13 18:09 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 18:55 ` thockin
2006-01-13 18:56 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2006-01-13 19:00 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-13 19:07 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2006-01-13 21:18 ` David Lang
2006-01-13 21:56 ` thockin
2006-01-13 22:05 ` David Lang
2006-01-13 22:18 ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2006-01-13 22:49 ` David Lang
2006-01-14 0:41 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2006-01-14 1:04 ` David Lang
2006-01-14 1:21 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2006-01-14 1:51 ` thockin
2006-01-15 8:52 ` Zan Lynx
2006-01-15 16:25 ` thockin
2006-01-15 16:33 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-15 18:21 ` thockin
2006-01-15 18:29 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-15 18:49 ` thockin
2006-01-14 1:13 ` thockin
2006-01-13 22:23 ` thockin
2006-01-13 19:13 ` Xavier Bestel
2006-01-13 19:32 ` thockin
2006-01-13 20:58 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] <5ujmj-1UQ-511@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uBnF-2SG-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uBnF-2SG-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uBxi-3iM-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uBGY-3ul-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uCa5-443-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uCjF-4fW-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <5uCtj-4Fi-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-14 0:24 ` Robert Hancock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060113181631.GA15366@hockin.org \
--to=thockin@hockin.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).