From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751074AbWANUZs (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:25:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751081AbWANUZr (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:25:47 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:53220 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751074AbWANUZr (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:25:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:25:21 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: chaosite@gmail.com Cc: daviado@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@gmail.com, robustmutexes@lists.osdl.org Subject: Re: Robust futex patch for Linux 2.6.15 Message-Id: <20060114122521.39f86ed5.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <43C9233A.20504@gmail.com> References: <20060113132704.207336d7.akpm@osdl.org> <43C9233A.20504@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Matan Peled wrote: > > Andrew, I'm looking at this: > > http://source.mvista.com/~dsingleton/robust-futex-1 > > And it doesn't seem to have a futex_deadlock function at all. In fact, its seems > to have a rather lengthy description about robust futexes and why they're a Good > Thing(TM). > > What are you looking at? A file which now appears to have been deleted..