From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751054AbWAPGhE (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:37:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751062AbWAPGhE (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:37:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:29658 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751054AbWAPGhA (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:37:00 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 01:36:53 -0500 From: Dave Jones To: Dave Airlie Cc: Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: 2.6.15-git breaks Xorg on em64t Message-ID: <20060116063653.GA3112@redhat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Dave Airlie , Andi Kleen , Linux Kernel References: <20060114065235.GA4539@redhat.com> <200601141943.28027.ak@suse.de> <20060114225137.GB23021@redhat.com> <200601150105.08197.ak@suse.de> <20060115070658.GB6454@redhat.com> <21d7e9970601150136m25ef428es139a641e2619997@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970601150136m25ef428es139a641e2619997@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 08:36:05PM +1100, Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Another datapoint btw: I've another EM64T that works just fine. > > The one that fails is the only one that isn't using onboard VGA, > > this one has a PCIE Radeon. Given it happens when X is starting up, > > it could be that the X radeon driver does something special which > > is why others aren't seeing this. > > > > It might be due to the DRM update that went through, but I can't think > what might have caused it, if you backout the DRM merge does it help > any? As it turns out, -git11 with all the DRM bits backed out gives me a working X again. > did the previous kernel have DRM support for that card? No. This is 1002:5b60 / 1002:5b70 based card. I had previously missed the 5b60 part in lspci output, so thinking there was no 5b70 addition, I hadn't considered this as a suspect. Mea Culpa. Looks like Andi is off the hook :-) Any ideas for any debugging I can add ? Dave