From: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] uml: avoid malloc to sleep in atomic sections
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:47:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200601181247.42976.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060117165602.3d29f936.akpm@osdl.org>
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 01:56, Andrew Morton wrote:
> "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@yahoo.it> wrote:
> > +int __cant_sleep(void) {
> > + return in_atomic() || irqs_disabled() || in_interrupt();
>
> aww, man, this is awful. Code is supposed to know what context it's
> running in, not go fishing about in core internals trying to fix up its own
> confusion.
Yes, I know.
But is libc supposed too? That's our problem. This code is only used for calls
to malloc() (not kmalloc()) after the kernel has booted.
There are a few calls to malloc in our code, ok, and those should be fixed
too.
But the main problem are glibc ones (which are called from all kinds of places
- we once got a crash because opendir() was calling malloc with big sizes -
we solved that by optionally using vmalloc()).
--
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894)
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
___________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger with Voice: chiama da PC a telefono a tariffe esclusive
http://it.messenger.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-18 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060117235659.14622.18544.stgit@zion.home.lan>
2006-01-18 0:19 ` [PATCH 1/9] uml: avoid sysfs warning on hot-unplug Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-01-18 2:53 ` Jeff Dike
2006-01-18 11:11 ` Blaisorblade
2006-01-18 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/9] uml: make daemon transport behave properly Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-01-18 0:19 ` [PATCH 3/9] uml: networking - clear transport-specific structure Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-01-18 0:19 ` [PATCH 4/9] uml: fix spinlock recursion and sleep-inside-spinlock in error path Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-01-18 0:52 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-18 11:44 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2006-01-18 0:19 ` [PATCH 5/9] uml: sigio code - reduce spinlock hold time Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-01-18 0:19 ` [PATCH 6/9] uml: avoid malloc to sleep in atomic sections Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-01-18 0:56 ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-18 11:47 ` Blaisorblade [this message]
2006-01-18 0:19 ` [PATCH 7/9] uml: arch Kconfig menu cleanups Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-01-18 0:19 ` [PATCH 8/9] uml: allow again to move backing file and to override saved location Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
2006-01-18 0:19 ` [PATCH 9/9] uml ubd code: fix a bit of whitespace Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200601181247.42976.blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--to=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).