From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932091AbWAUKTg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:19:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932094AbWAUKTg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:19:36 -0500 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:43418 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932091AbWAUKTg (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 05:19:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:19:17 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, george@wildturkeyfarm.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] Normalize timespec for negative values in ns_to_timespec Message-Id: <20060121021917.1ab7787c.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060121094137.049533000@localhost.localdomain> References: <20060121094137.049533000@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Cc: George Anzinger > From: George Anzinger How many email addresses does the man have, and which is preferred? > In case of a negative nsec value the result of the division must be > normalized. What effect did this problem have? oopses? Userspace misbehaviour? ...