From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751218AbWAUXAU (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:00:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751220AbWAUXAU (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:00:20 -0500 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:61457 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219AbWAUXAT (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:00:19 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:00:07 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Andrey Borzenkov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olaf Hering Subject: Re: cc-version not available to change EXTRA_CFLAGS Message-ID: <20060121230007.GB13756@mars.ravnborg.org> References: <200601212207.49483.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601212207.49483.arvidjaar@mail.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:07:42PM +0300, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > > Which raises the question - I believed, we support Intel CC for kernel > compilation? Or was just just a dream? We have include/linux/compiler-intel.h as the only artifact to support the Intel compiler. In all other places we assume gcc - but Intel tries hard to be gcc alike. Sam