From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Han <xiphux@gmail.com>, Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Jake Moilanen <moilanen@austin.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.2 for 2.6.16-rc1 and 2.6.16-rc1-mm1
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:52:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060123215231.04b38886@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1138047938.21481.11.camel@mindpipe>
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:25:37 -0500
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> This seems right to me, how do you expect X to be treated by the
> scheduler?
Why moving the mouse a little (that causes a microscopic % of CPU
being used) makes X priority jump up to 29 from 6/7 ???
And why this doesn't happen when glxgears (for example) is running?
(under cpu load this is different, with X never getting "good"
priority -- if I remember correctly)
Maybe this is normal and depends on the way X sleeps or something...
I don't know much about schedulers but if I'm able to make the cursor
going in jerks with just a bit of CPU load (linux$ make -j16, for
example) I wonder why X cannot get a better priority...
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.16-rc1-plugsched on x86_64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-23 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 21:45 [ANNOUNCE][RFC] PlugSched-6.2 for 2.6.16-rc1 and 2.6.16-rc1-mm1 Peter Williams
2006-01-21 6:48 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-21 10:46 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-21 23:06 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-22 22:47 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-23 0:49 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-23 20:21 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-24 0:00 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-26 1:09 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-26 8:11 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-26 22:34 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-28 23:44 ` Peter Williams
2006-01-31 17:44 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-23 20:09 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-23 20:25 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-23 20:52 ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
2006-01-23 20:59 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-23 21:10 ` Paolo Ornati
2006-01-23 21:11 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-23 23:32 ` Peter Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060123215231.04b38886@localhost \
--to=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moilanen@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=xiphux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).