From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751134AbWAYMK0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:10:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751135AbWAYMK0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:10:26 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48518 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751134AbWAYMKZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2006 07:10:25 -0500 From: Andi Kleen To: Akinobu Mita Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] {set,clear,test}_bit() related cleanup Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:46:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org References: <20060125112625.GA18584@miraclelinux.com> <20060125112857.GB18584@miraclelinux.com> In-Reply-To: <20060125112857.GB18584@miraclelinux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601251246.34314.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 25 January 2006 12:28, Akinobu Mita wrote: > While working on these patch set, I found several possible cleanup > on x86-64 and ia64. Please don't send emails with that big cc lists [dropped most of them] I applied the x86-64 bits. Thanks. Please send the ia64 bits separately to the IA64 maintainer. -Andi