From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751156AbWAYU7A (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:59:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751155AbWAYU67 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:58:59 -0500 Received: from palrel10.hp.com ([156.153.255.245]:16825 "EHLO palrel10.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751192AbWAYU67 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:58:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:59:07 -0800 From: Grant Grundler To: Akinobu Mita Cc: Linux Kernel Development , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h Message-ID: <20060125205907.GF9995@esmail.cup.hp.com> References: <20060125112625.GA18584@miraclelinux.com> <20060125113206.GD18584@miraclelinux.com> <20060125200250.GA26443@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060125200250.GA26443@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:02:50PM +0000, Russell King wrote: > I've not really looked at the rest because I haven't figured out which > bits will be used on ARM and which won't - which I think is another > problem with this patch set. I'll look again later tonight. Russell, I have the same problem. This file is 920 lines long and contains 7 distinct changes according to the (well written) notes. Akinobu, I appreciate your work - but could this particular peice be split up into 7 chunks? That would make checking the behavior of something like HAVE_ARCH_FFZ_BITOPS easier for each arch. thanks, grant