From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Edward Shishkin <edward@namesys.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress)
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:21:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060127082113.GV4311@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43D9D681.7020002@namesys.com>
On Fri, Jan 27 2006, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > So the systime quoted above is basically useless, it doesn't reflect the
> >
> >real time spent in the kernel by far. I think you should note that when
> >you post these scores, otherwise you're really showing a skewed picture.
> >
> >
> >
> He wasn't expecting me to post the benchmark, and I frankly only looked
> at the real time and forgot there was a systime in there that needed
> cutting out when I posted it. My error, not his. I must say though, the
> real time makes me quite happy, especially considering how CPUs are just
> going to keep getting faster.
Yeah and that's ok, I was just interested in seeing some more
interesting compression benchmarks so I wondered if you had done that.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-27 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <43D7C6BE.1010804@namesys.com>
2006-01-25 18:59 ` random minor benchmark: Re: Copy 20 tarfiles: ext2 vs (reiser4, unixfile) vs (reiser4,cryptcompress) Hans Reiser
2006-01-26 15:33 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-26 18:17 ` Edward Shishkin
2006-01-26 18:56 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-26 20:41 ` Edward Shishkin
2006-01-27 7:43 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-27 8:09 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-27 8:06 ` Jens Axboe
2006-01-27 8:14 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-27 8:21 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-01-27 8:41 ` Hans Reiser
2006-01-28 16:53 ` Alexander Zarochentsev
2006-01-27 7:30 ` Hans Reiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060127082113.GV4311@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=Reiserfs-List@namesys.com \
--cc=edward@namesys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).