From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161112AbWBAU0Y (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:26:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161113AbWBAU0X (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:26:23 -0500 Received: from 22.107.233.220.exetel.com.au ([220.233.107.22]:11027 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161112AbWBAU0X (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2006 15:26:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:26:10 +1100 To: Ingo Molnar Cc: "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [lock validator] inet6_destroy_sock(): soft-safe -> soft-unsafe lock dependency Message-ID: <20060201202610.GA13107@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20060128152204.GA13940@elte.hu> <20060131102758.GA31460@gondor.apana.org.au> <20060131.024323.83813817.davem@davemloft.net> <20060201133219.GA1435@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060201133219.GA1435@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Herbert Xu Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 02:32:19PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > update: with all of Herbert's fixes i havent gotten these yet - so maybe > the validator was not producing a false positive, but perhaps the > inet6_destroy_sock()->sk_dst_reset() thing was causing the messages? Maybe. But in that case shouldn't the validator show that code-path? Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt