From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932518AbWBIO4j (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:56:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932522AbWBIO4i (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:56:38 -0500 Received: from ns9.hostinglmi.net ([213.194.149.146]:8607 "EHLO ns9.hostinglmi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932518AbWBIO4h (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:56:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:57:40 +0100 From: DervishD To: Joerg Schilling Cc: peter.read@gmail.com, matthias.andree@gmx.de, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net Subject: Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) Message-ID: <20060209145740.GB94@DervishD> Mail-Followup-To: Joerg Schilling , peter.read@gmail.com, matthias.andree@gmx.de, lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jim@why.dont.jablowme.net References: <43E7545E.nail7GN11WAQ9@burner> <73d8d0290602060706o75f04c1cx@mail.gmail.com> <43E7680E.2000506@gmx.de> <20060206205437.GA12270@voodoo> <43E89B56.nailA792EWNLG@burner> <20060207183712.GC5341@voodoo> <43E9F1CD.nail2BR11FL52@burner> <20060208210219.GB9166@DervishD> <20060208211455.GC2480@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <43EB1988.nail7EL2I7AN6@burner> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <43EB1988.nail7EL2I7AN6@burner> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: DervishD X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ns9.hostinglmi.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - dervishd.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Joerg :) * Joerg Schilling dixit: > lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: > > Hmm, perhaps what should be done is that someone needs to write and > > maintain a patch that linux users can apply to cdrecord (since other OSs > > are different and hence have no reason to use such a patch), to make it > > behave in a manner which is sane on linux. It should of course be > > clearly marked as having been changed in such a way. It should use udev > > if available and HAL and whatever else is appropriate on a modern linux > > system, and if on an old system it should at least not break the > > interfaces that already worked on those systems in cdrecord. > > Unfortunately is it a matter oif facts that all known patches for > cdrecord break more things than they claim to fix. Could you please clarify which things are broken by Matthias patch? This way he (or other developer) can prepare a better patch and maintain it. BTW, I patched my cdrecord with Matthias patch and nothing seems to be broken :? Maybe am I missing something? Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen!