From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161181AbWBTVAF (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:00:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161182AbWBTVAF (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:00:05 -0500 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:12718 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161181AbWBTVAE (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:00:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:59:32 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Nigel Cunningham Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Sebastian K?gler , Matthias Hensler , rjw@sisk.pl, kernel list , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net Subject: Re: Which is simpler? (Was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: [ 00/10] [Suspend2] Modules support.) Message-ID: <20060220205932.GD21557@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060201113710.6320.68289.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20060220195155.GB7444@thunk.org> <20060220200807.GB21557@elf.ucw.cz> <200602210644.38538.nigel@suspend2.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200602210644.38538.nigel@suspend2.net> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Út 21-02-06 06:44:34, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > Hi. > > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 06:08, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Maybe you feel you are in a power position because your code happened > > > to enter the kernel first, so you few you can have veto power over all > > > other contenders. It sometimes works that way, but only up to a > > > > Unfortunately, I do not need to veto suspend2. It is so complex that > > it vetoes itself. Last time akpm stopped it, IIRC. > > I'm going to let most of the last 8 hours' emails float by without reply, but > think I should comment here. Thanks. > I don't believe I've ever seen an email from Andrew stopping a merge, and I > shouldn't have, because I've never asked him to merge it. Being the > perfectionist that I am, I've sought to get it as stable, reliable and > comment-clean as I reasonably could before merging. I believe I seen reply to that effect (saying "it is working and fast is not enough for merge", or something like that. Anyway, please Cc me on merge attempts... Pavel -- Web maintainer for suspend.sf.net (www.sf.net/projects/suspend) wanted...