From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932246AbWBXBAF (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:00:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932258AbWBXBAF (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:00:05 -0500 Received: from mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.195]:46747 "EHLO mail14.syd.optusnet.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932246AbWBXBAE (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:00:04 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: Peter Williams Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: smpnice -- apply review suggestions Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:59:27 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , npiggin@suse.de, "Siddha, Suresh B" , "Chen, Kenneth W" , John Hawkes References: <43FD0CA8.6060701@bigpond.net.au> In-Reply-To: <43FD0CA8.6060701@bigpond.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602241159.28292.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 23 February 2006 12:15, Peter Williams wrote: > This patch applies the suggestions made by Con Kolivas for improving the > smpnice code. > > The non cosmetic part of the patch addresses the fact the mapping from > nice values to task load weights for negative nice values does not match > the implied CPU allocations in the function task_timeslice(). As > suggested by Con the mapping function now uses the time slice > information directly (via a slightly modified interface). Looks good to me. > Signed-off-by: Peter Williams Signed-off-by: Con Kolivas