From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751281AbWBZIzt (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 03:55:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751283AbWBZIzt (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 03:55:49 -0500 Received: from natfrord.rzone.de ([81.169.145.161]:31629 "EHLO natfrord.rzone.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751281AbWBZIzs (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 03:55:48 -0500 From: Wolfgang Hoffmann Reply-To: woho@woho.de To: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert sky2 to 0.13a Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:57:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , Jeff Garzik , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ian Kumlien , Pavel Volkovitskiy , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <4400FC28.1060705@gmx.net> <20060225180353.5908c955@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20060225180353.5908c955@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602260957.04305.woho@woho.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 26 February 2006 03:03, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Instead of whining, try this. I tried and still see the hang. Stephen, if you want me (as suggested off-list) to bisect the individual patches leading from 0.13a to current head, please give me a series of patches to incrementally apply, eighter via mail/ftp/git, and I'll test. I don't want to hack the patches together myself, because results would be worthless if I screw up, and given that I have no networking background chances are high ... It takes me between 5 - 20 GB of data transfer to reproduce the hang, so it will take a while, but I'm willing to help. If you see vendor chip specs arrive soon and feel it's not worth the hassle, that's fine for me, too. In the meanwhile, I'll resort to 0.13a Wolfgang