From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751022AbWBZXCY (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:02:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751420AbWBZXCX (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:02:23 -0500 Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de ([81.169.145.166]:13769 "EHLO natnoddy.rzone.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751022AbWBZXCW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:02:22 -0500 From: Wolfgang Hoffmann Reply-To: woho@woho.de To: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert sky2 to 0.13a Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 00:03:45 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 Cc: pomac@vapor.com, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , Jeff Garzik , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Volkovitskiy , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <4400FC28.1060705@gmx.net> <200602261913.36308.woho@woho.de> <200602262331.47750.woho@woho.de> In-Reply-To: <200602262331.47750.woho@woho.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200602270003.46353.woho@woho.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 26 February 2006 23:31, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote: > On Sunday 26 February 2006 19:13, Wolfgang Hoffmann wrote: > > Ok, I did some reading and just started a git bisect. I didn't find hints > > on how to bisect if I'm only interested in changes to sky2.[ch], so I'm > > taking the full kernel tree and skip testing those bisect steps that > > didn't change sky2.[ch]. > > > > Looking at Carl-Daniels 0.13a and Stephens patch against 0.15 in this > > thread, I'll patch each bisect step such that sky2_poll() has > > > >        sky2_write32(hw, STAT_CTRL, SC_STAT_CLR_IRQ); > >        if (sky2_read8(hw, STAT_LEV_TIMER_CTRL) == TIM_START) { > >                sky2_write8(hw, STAT_LEV_TIMER_CTRL, TIM_STOP); > >                sky2_write8(hw, STAT_LEV_TIMER_CTRL, TIM_START); > >         } > > > > after exit_loop. Is that ok? > > > > I'll report as soon as I have results. > > Bisect done: > > 4d52b48b43d0d1d5959fa722ee0046e3542e5e1b is first bad commit > [PATCH] sky2: support msi interrupt (revised) > > Reverting this commit in git head seems to work, at least the driver builds > and loads. Is that sane? > > I'm currently testing this (without any further modifications), let's see > if it hangs or not. Ok, no hangs yet. This version passed a test scenario only 0.13a has survived so far. I'll continue to use this to give it more testing tomorrow. Looking at the reverted commit, I wonder if modprobing sky2 with disable_msi=1 is equivalent to reverting the commit?