From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751235AbWDQT0l (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:26:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751234AbWDQT0l (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:26:41 -0400 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.151]:20172 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751230AbWDQT0k (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:26:40 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 14:26:34 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Stephen Smalley Cc: casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, James Morris , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fireflier-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks Message-ID: <20060417192634.GB18990@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <20060417180231.71328.qmail@web36606.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1145297742.8542.206.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1145297742.8542.206.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Stephen Smalley (sds@tycho.nsa.gov): > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 11:02 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote: > > > > --- Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > Or, better, remove LSM itself ;) > > > > > > Seriously that makes a lot of sense. All other > > > modules people have come up > > > with over the last years are irrelevant and/or > > > broken by design. > > > > Didn't you mean "Bah!" (waves paw)? > > > > I understand the enthusiasm that the SELinux > > following demonstrates for the technology. > > I do not appreciate the bashing of alternatives. > > Then provide a counterexample. Hopefully a new version of evm+slim+ima will be ready for distribution soon. -serge