From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751226AbWDSUNW@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751226AbWDSUNW (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:13:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751227AbWDSUNV
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:13:21 -0400
Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:30697 "EHLO mx1.suse.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751226AbWDSUNU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 19 Apr 2006 16:13:20 -0400
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 13:11:54 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>, James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
       Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
       Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>, T?r?k Edwin <edwin@gurde.com>,
       linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks)
Message-ID: <20060419201154.GB20545@kroah.com>
References: <200604142301.10188.edwin@gurde.com> <1145290013.8542.141.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20060417162345.GA9609@infradead.org> <1145293404.8542.190.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20060417173319.GA11506@infradead.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604171454070.17563@d.namei> <20060417195146.GA8875@kroah.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604191010300.12755@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> <1145462454.3085.62.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604192102001.7177@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604192102001.7177@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 09:06:57PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >> 
> >> Well then, have a look at http://alphagate.hopto.org/multiadm/
> >> 
> >
> >hmm on first sight that seems to be basically an extension to the
> >existing capability() code... rather than a 'real' LSM module. Am I
> >missing something here?
> >
> 
> (So what's the definition for a "real" LSM module?)

No idea, try submitting the patch :)

thanks,

greg k-h