linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/14] random: Remove SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from network drivers
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 15:34:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060505203436.GW15445@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060505191127.GA16076@thunk.org>

On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 03:11:27PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 12:24:26PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > I haven't seen such an analysis, scholarly or otherwise and my bias
> > here is to lean towards the paranoid.
> > 
> > Assuming a machine with no TSC and an otherwise quiescent ethernet
> > (hackers burning the midnight oil), I think most of the
> > hard-to-analyze bits above get pretty transparent.
> 
> As always, whether or not the packet arrival times could be guessable
> and/or controlled by an attacker really depends on your threat model.
> For someone who has an ethernet monitor attached directly to the
> segment right next to your computer, it's very likely that they would
> be successful in guessing the inputs into the entropy pool.  However,
> an attacker with physical access to your machine could probably do all
> sorts of other things, such as install a keyboard sniffer, etc.  
> 
> For a remote attacker, life gets much more difficult.  Each switch,
> router, and bridge effectively has a queue into which packets must
> flow through, and that is _not_ known to a remote attacker.  This is
> especially true today, when most people don't even use repeaters, but
> rather switches/bridges, which effectly make each ethernet connection
> to each host its own separate collision domain (indeed that term
> doesn't even apply for modern high-speed ethernets).
> 
> I've always thought the right answer is that whether or not network
> packet arrival times should be used as entropy input should be
> configurable, since depending on the environment, it might or might
> not be safe, and for some hosts (particularly diskless servers), the
> network might be the only source of entropy available to them.

Nonetheless, the current SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM scheme should go. A) it's in
the IRQ fast path B) most of its users are bogus which strongly
indicates it's a bad API.

Instead (if we want network entropy) we should add an
add_network_randomness call in some central location in the network
stack (probably right next to netpoll's RX hooks) and probably have it
compiled out by default.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-05 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-05 16:42 [PATCH 1/14] random: Remove SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from floppy driver Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 6/14] random: Remove redundant SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from touchscreen drivers Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 4/14] random: Change cpqarray to use add_disk_randomness Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 2/14] random: Remove redundant SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from NinjaSCSI Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 3/14] random: Make CCISS use add_disk_randomness Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 5/14] random: Remove bogus SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from at91 compact flash driver Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 8/14] random: Remove SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from USB gadget drivers Matt Mackall
2006-05-06 11:07   ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-05-06 18:16     ` David Brownell
2006-05-06 18:31       ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 7/14] random: Remove SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from network drivers Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 17:13   ` Kyle Moffett
2006-05-05 17:24     ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 19:11       ` Theodore Tso
2006-05-05 20:30         ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-05-05 20:34         ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2006-05-06 11:55           ` Theodore Tso
2006-05-06 16:48             ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-06 17:29               ` Bernd Eckenfels
2006-05-06 18:05               ` Theodore Tso
2006-05-06 20:33                 ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-07  0:17                   ` David S. Miller
2006-05-07  1:22                   ` Theodore Tso
2006-05-07  5:07                     ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-08 21:58                     ` Sami Farin
2006-05-24 22:47                 ` Marcin Dalecki
2006-05-25  0:08                   ` Theodore Tso
2006-05-31 19:29                     ` Bill Davidsen
2006-05-07  0:08               ` David S. Miller
2006-05-07  4:59                 ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-07  5:46                   ` David S. Miller
2006-05-07 16:31                     ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-07 13:13                   ` Thiago Galesi
2006-05-07 16:00                     ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-07 17:00                       ` Thiago Galesi
2006-05-08  0:13                       ` Theodore Tso
2006-05-08  2:55                         ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-08  6:26                   ` Pavel Machek
2006-05-08  7:07                     ` David S. Miller
2006-05-08 14:05                       ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-08 17:21                         ` Pavel Machek
2006-05-08 17:27                           ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-09 11:23                             ` Pavel Machek
2006-05-11 10:05                           ` Ph. Marek
2006-05-24 22:35         ` Marcin Dalecki
2006-05-05 21:10   ` David S. Miller
2006-05-05 23:03     ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 23:19       ` David S. Miller
2006-05-06 14:08     ` Folkert van Heusden
2006-05-06 15:19       ` Lee Revell
2006-05-07 10:35         ` Folkert van Heusden
2006-05-07 16:33           ` Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 9/14] random: Remove SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from i2c drivers Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 10/14] random: Remove bogus SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from mpc52xx serial driver Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 11/14] random: Remove UML usage of SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 13/14] random: Remove SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from IRQ fastpath Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 12/14] random: Remove not very useful SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from lubbock Matt Mackall
2006-05-05 16:42 ` [PATCH 14/14] random: Remove add_interrupt_randomness Matt Mackall
2006-05-08  7:38 [PATCH 7/14] random: Remove SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM from network drivers linux
2006-05-12  6:09 ` linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060505203436.GW15445@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).