From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964860AbWF1FpX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 01:45:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964868AbWF1FpX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 01:45:23 -0400 Received: from omx1-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.179.11]:29931 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964860AbWF1FpW (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2006 01:45:22 -0400 Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:44:33 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Ingo Molnar Cc: 76306.1226@compuserve.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, ak@suse.de, drepper@redhat.com, roland@redhat.com, jakub@redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2 Message-Id: <20060627224433.fb726e0c.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060621081539.GA14227@elte.hu> References: <200606210329_MC3-1-C305-E008@compuserve.com> <20060621081539.GA14227@elte.hu> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.3; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > but my gut feeling is that we should add a proper sys_get_cpu() syscall Yes - this should be for more or less all arch's. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.925.600.0401