From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932128AbWGXMOg (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:14:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932129AbWGXMOg (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:14:36 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:25790 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932128AbWGXMOg (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jul 2006 08:14:36 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add maintainer for memory management Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:13:52 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter , linux-mm@kvack.org References: <1153713707.4002.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1153713707.4002.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607241413.52064.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Note: If someone else is more likely the person than Christoph, don't be > offended that I didn't choose you. It's just that Christoph has > responded the most whenever I mention anything about memory. So I chose > that as my criteria, than looking at who submits the most memory > patches. You can't just someone give a maintainer job until they agree first. Adding just the mailing list without "maintained" should be ok though. -Andi