From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030416AbWGZGmL (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:42:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030420AbWGZGmL (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:42:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:2770 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030419AbWGZGmK (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 02:42:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:42:02 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: NeilBrown Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 007 of 9] knfsd: Separate out some parts of nfsd_svc, which start nfs servers. Message-Id: <20060725234202.078ecb48.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1060725015457.21981@suse.de> References: <20060725114207.21779.patches@notabene> <1060725015457.21981@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 11:54:57 +1000 NeilBrown wrote: > > Separate out the code for creating a new service, and for creating > initial sockets. > > Some of these new functions will have multiple callers soon. In which case they shouldn't be inlined, hmm? > +static inline int nfsd_create_serv(void) > +{ > + int err = 0; > + lock_kernel(); > + if (nfsd_serv) { > + nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads++; > + unlock_kernel(); > + return 0; > + } > + > + atomic_set(&nfsd_busy, 0); > + nfsd_serv = svc_create(&nfsd_program, NFSD_BUFSIZE, > + nfsd_last_thread); > + if (nfsd_serv == NULL) > + err = -ENOMEM; > + else > + nfsd_serv->sv_nrthreads++; > + unlock_kernel(); > + do_gettimeofday(&nfssvc_boot); /* record boot time */ > + return err; > +} > +