From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030267AbWGYXpw (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:45:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030261AbWGYXpw (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:45:52 -0400 Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it ([212.216.176.224]:42723 "EHLO vsmtp4.tin.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030269AbWGYXpv (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:45:51 -0400 From: Luigi Genoni To: "Horst H. von Brand" Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 01:45:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 Cc: Hans Reiser , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200607252117.k6PLHmSp016039@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> In-Reply-To: <200607252117.k6PLHmSp016039@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607260145.34062.genoni@darkstar.oltrelinux.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I suppose from the ones, lime me, who has production servers, but also some test system to play with. Luigi On Tuesday 25 July 2006 23:17, Horst H. von Brand wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > > Wow, I would never have guessed our market share was that high as 1/5th > > of ext3. I mean, you can't even get a distro which allows you to > > install onto reiser4 without hours of work so far as I know. I guess > > there are people who really do care about twice as fast. > > That makes the data /higly/ suspect: Most of the Linux users I know > wouldn't know where to start to compile a kernel, forget about patching > around. And of the minority who can, they mostly run machines in > production, and won't dream of using non-distribution kernels, let alone > custom patched ones. > > BTW, where do you get the "twice as fast" number from?