From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751612AbWGZN2t (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:28:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751609AbWGZN2t (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:28:49 -0400 Received: from host36-195-149-62.serverdedicati.aruba.it ([62.149.195.36]:25543 "EHLO mx.cpushare.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750718AbWGZN2t (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:28:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 15:29:57 +0200 From: andrea@cpushare.com To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Hans Reiser , Nikita Danilov , Rene Rebe , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion Message-ID: <20060726132957.GH32243@opteron.random> References: <44C12F0A.1010008@namesys.com> <20060722130219.GB7321@thunk.org> <200607230920.04129.rene@exactcode.de> <17604.31639.213450.987415@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060725123558.GA32243@opteron.random> <44C65931.6030207@namesys.com> <20060726124557.GB23701@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060726124557.GB23701@stusta.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 02:45:57PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 11:47:29AM -0600, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > Wow, I would never have guessed our market share was that high as 1/5th > > of ext3. I mean, you can't even get a distro which allows you to > > install onto reiser4 without hours of work so far as I know. I guess > > there are people who really do care about twice as fast. > > I doubt Andreas values have much value. I think nobody ever pretended them to have much value, they only need to have some minor value to be useful. And as far as I can tell no better source of data about the kernel testing userbase exists as of today. > According to the numbers on the klive website, Gentoo has 47 times as > many users as SuSE (sic). > > Considering that klive is offered by someone working for SuSE, the > Gentoo project could make a good news article ("Numbers by a SuSE > developer confirm Gentoo has 47 times the market share of Suse.") > out of it. ;-) Oh well, you misunderstood KLive completely. Please read again the top of the page: "this project aims to provide kernel live feedback about the usage of every different Linux Kernel version". Where did I ever mention anything about distributions? There's absolutely no way to tell which distribution is running. I only can tell which _kernel_ is running. It could be 100% of the mainline users are running mainline on top of SUSE distro, or on top of Gentoo, or on top of Ubuntuu, there's absolutely no way to know about the distro. Nobody could ever make a claim like the above by using the KLive data. To make an example I run mainline myself on top of opensuse 10.1, and I get rightfully accounted as a "mainline" and not as a "SUSE". All you can tell is that there are many more people running KLive in combination with Gentoo kernels than with SUSE kernels. But you can't tell anything about what kind of distribution is running. One could guess the Gentoo kernels run on top of a Gentoo userland, but for the mainline ones you really can't tell, they could be slackware but they could be any other distro too. Also note that the cpushare.com domain is not related to any distro, so the fact I also do consulting for SUSE is irrelevant to KLive or any other dealings at the cpushare.com domain. As long there is people running KLive and browsing the website like now, it means somebody thinks it's useful and so I keep delivering the service. As of now, the Gentoo and mainline kernel users are the ones providing most of the feedback. Perhaps I should have filed a patent on KLive too just to make you happy, right?