From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1750803AbWG0PwY@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750803AbWG0PwY (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:52:24 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750817AbWG0PwY
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:52:24 -0400
Received: from dspnet.fr.eu.org ([213.186.44.138]:31752 "EHLO dspnet.fr.eu.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750803AbWG0PwX (ORCPT
	<rfc822;Linux-Kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 27 Jul 2006 11:52:23 -0400
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:52:22 +0200
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>, Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org>
Subject: Re: the " 'official' point of view" expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion
Message-ID: <20060727155222.GA30593@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <Linux-Kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>, Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org>
References: <44C12F0A.1010008@namesys.com> <20060722130219.GB7321@thunk.org> <44C42B92.40507@xfs.org> <17604.31844.765717.375423@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060724103023.GA7615@thunk.org> <20060724113534.GA64920@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20060724133939.GA11353@thunk.org> <20060724153853.GA88678@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20060726130806.GA5270@ucw.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060726130806.GA5270@ucw.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 01:08:06PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> > > A much more important effect is that non-maintainers aren't familiar
> > > with coding and patch submission guidelines.  For example, in
> > > suspend2, Nigel first tried with patches that were too monolithic,
> > > and then his next series was too broken down such that it was too
> > > hard to review (and "git bisect" wouldn't work).
> > 
> > All his submissions since 2004 or so?  It's a little easy to limit
> > oneself to the last two ones.
> 
> Nigel did not do any submissions in 2004 or so. Check your fact, that
> stuff was marked 'RFC' and yes I did comment on it.

2004-09-16 submission:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/76
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/77
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/78
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/81
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/82
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/83
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/86
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/87
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/89
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/9/16/90


2004-11-24 submission:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/24/93
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/24/94
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/24/95
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/24/96
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/24/97
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/24/98
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/24/100
http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/11/24/101
[58 mails or so total]


> He did 1 (one) submission that looked like SubmittingPatches at the
> first sight, and that was very recent.
> 
> Stop spreading lies.

I am awaiting your apologies.

  OG.