From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750989AbWG0Ssg (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:48:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751945AbWG0Ssf (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:48:35 -0400 Received: from inti.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.21.155]:46801 "EHLO inti.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750989AbWG0Ssf (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:48:35 -0400 Message-Id: <200607271843.k6RIhmbe013686@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> To: "Luigi Genoni" cc: "Horst H. von Brand" , "Adrian Bunk" , andrea@cpushare.com, "J. Bruce Fields" , "Hans Reiser" , "Nikita Danilov" , "Rene Rebe" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" Subject: Re: the ' 'official' point of view' expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion In-Reply-To: Message from "Luigi Genoni" of "Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:31:07 +0200." <4095.192.167.206.189.1154010667.squirrel@darkstar.linuxpratico.net> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.1; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 19) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:43:48 -0400 From: "Horst H. von Brand" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (inti.inf.utfsm.cl [200.1.19.1]); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:43:49 -0400 (CLT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Luigi Genoni wrote: [...] > Since reiser4 is not something enabled by default into a default kernel > distribution, I assume they enabled it knowing what they where doing because > they wanted to use it. You know, I compile ReiserFS, JFS and XFS (and also CRAMFS and ROMFS) into my self-compiled kernels too. Haven't used any of them in ages (if ever), but one more go at compile-testing won't hurt... -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513