From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1161351AbWHAHrr@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1161351AbWHAHrr (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Tue, 1 Aug 2006 03:47:47 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161354AbWHAHrq
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 1 Aug 2006 03:47:46 -0400
Received: from blinkenlights.ch ([62.202.0.18]:23251 "EHLO blinkenlights.ch")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161351AbWHAHrq (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 1 Aug 2006 03:47:46 -0400
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:47:45 +0200
From: Adrian Ulrich <reiser4@blinkenlights.ch>
To: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl>
Cc: vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, matthias.andree@gmx.de, ipso@snappymail.ca,
       reiser@namesys.com, lkml@lpbproductions.com, jeff@garzik.org,
       tytso@mit.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Solaris ZFS on Linux [Was: Re: the " 'official' point of view"
 expressed by kernelnewbies.org regarding reiser4 inclusion]
Message-Id: <20060801094745.1ad9f4fd.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch>
In-Reply-To: <200607312208.k6VM82P5012867@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl>
References: <20060731225734.ecf5eb4d.reiser4@blinkenlights.ch>
	<200607312208.k6VM82P5012867@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl>
Organization: Bluewin AG
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.6 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-slackware-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> So ZFS isn't "state-of-the-art"?

Of course it's state-of-the-art (on Solaris ;-) )

 
> WAFL is for high-turnover filesystems on RAID-5 (and assumes flash memory
> staging areas). 

 s/RAID-5/RAID-4/

> Not your run-of-the-mill desktop...

The WAFL-Thing was just a joke ;-)


Regards,
 Adrian